Snack attack: how to help prevent your thrips bios from eating one another

Effective biocontrol programs for western flower thrips often use multiple natural enemies.  These include predatory mites like N. cucumeris or A. swirskii, but also  generalist predators like Atheta and Orius, which can feed on mite eggs and nymphs.

So, how can you make sure your generalist predators aren’t just eating all your predatory mites, instead of your thrips?

Slide1

The voracious predatory beetle Atheta coriaria (left) is often used to help control thrips pupae in the soil.  The mite N. cucumeris (right) is commonly used on the foliage to control thrips larvae. Interactions between the two can end poorly for mite. (Photo of Atheta by S. Jandricic; photo of N. cucumeris courtesy of greenhouseipm.org).

A recent study by Michigan State University suggests that the release strategy you choose for your biocontrol agents can affect whether your bios play nice together or not.

Specifically, they looked at how either breeder piles of  N. cucumeris (i.e. small piles of predatory mites, bran and feeder-mites placed on the soil surface) or slow-release mite sachets  (paper sachets filled with predatory mites, bran and feeder-mites, hung in the crop), fared in a crop also using Atheta coriaria for biocontrol.

Not surprisingly, the researchers found that a high number of Atheta invaded the breeder piles on the soil surface, but that Atheta rarely ever found their way inside sachets (Fig 1).  Unfortunately, the end result was that breeder piles produced 6-8 fold fewer predatory mites than sachets did, likely due in part to Atheta consuming eggs and nymphs of N. cucumeris.

Fig 1 Pochubay paper

Fig. 1 (Figure 1 from Pochubay et a. 2015). Mean number of Atheta extracted from breeder piles each week (top dotted line).

The team at MSU also did a separate test to look at dispersal of mites between the two release strategies  – because what good is a lot of predatory mites if they just want to stay home and watch TV instead of going out to eat?  The researchers found that more mites dispersed from sachets compared to breeder piles, and that they continued to disperse for a longer period (Fig. 2, below).  

mite dispersal

Fig. 2 (Figure 4 from Pochubay et al. 2015). Mean number of N. cucumeris  dispersing from sachets (solid line) or breeder piles (dashed line).  This test was done in the absence of Atheta.

Overall, this study showed that the use of mite sachets helps defend predatory mites against intraguild-predation (i.e. being eaten by another beneficial!), AND that sachets result in more predatory mites dispersing onto plants than breeder piles.  This sounds like a win-win to me!

So if you’re currently using breeder piles, you may want to take a second look at sachets to achieve the best thrips control possible in your greenhouse.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in biological control, Natural enemy interactions, Predatory mites, Thrips and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Snack attack: how to help prevent your thrips bios from eating one another

  1. This far much better than using pesticide. I heard of this one from an organic farming seminar. Thanks for sharing!

    Like

  2. Benjie Evans says:

    Great research! thank you for sharing, we can use this also us basis in our studies.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s